SAP C_THR81 Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | SAP |
| Exam Name: | SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management |
| Exam Number: | C_THR81_2605 |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Response |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Typically 1 year (SAP Stay Current requirement applies) |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 65% |
| Exam Price: | USD 560 (varies by region) |
| Related Certifications: | SAP Certified Associate - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core SAP Certified Associate - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central |
| Sample Questions: | SAP C_THR81 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or authorized test center |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites, but recommended familiarity with SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central fundamentals. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://training.sap.com/certification |
SAP C_THR81 Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Position Management | - Position management setup
|
| Topic 2: Employee Data Management | - Data maintenance
|
| Topic 3: SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Overview | - Core HR foundation concepts
|
| Topic 4: Organizational Management | - Organizational structure setup
|
| Topic 5: Reporting and Integration | - Integration concepts
|
SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:
1. A consultant is validating position maintenance in a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central and Position Management environment before a reorganization freeze ends. In the web-based UI, managers can create new positions, but some newly created positions remain in a draft-like state and cannot be used in downstream planning activities even though the save action completes without error.
Older positions created earlier in the project are available as expected. The customer confirms that the affected positions are all created under a newly introduced position category. The business wants a fix that keeps the category structure intact and avoids asking users to recreate positions manually across multiple departments.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:
A) Export the affected positions, change their identifiers externally, and reload them under a different category structure.
B) Review the configuration dependency tied to the new position category and correct the setting that controls whether saved positions become usable for downstream planning.
C) Ask managers to keep using the older position categories until the new category can be removed from the design.
D) Grant managers broader access to planning activities so the newly created positions become selectable despite their current state.
2. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Warehouse Position Context for Shift Lead Assignments</strong> A warehouse assignment can be saved, but the manager-facing review later displays inconsistent district context. The sponsor asks whether the team can proceed if HR operations verifies warehouse assignments offline.
Which response best reflects the performance-versus-governance trade-off?
Response:
A) Proceed with offline HR verification because it preserves the rehearsal schedule and the assignment record saves successfully.
B) Open all warehouse positions to district managers temporarily so they can confirm assignments faster during final testing.
C) Narrow the rehearsal scope and validate representative warehouse assignments in the system before relying on offline confirmation.
D) Stop all store and warehouse testing until every position record across the company is rebuilt.
3. A consultant is validating a controlled employee data correction process in a web-based SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant before month-end operations. HR operations users can open employee records and preview changes for a restricted regional population, but the final submit action is unavailable only for that group.
HR administrators can submit the same correction successfully. The customer wants the approved operations team to handle this process for the restricted region without extending broad administrator access, because the data is sensitive and audit review depends on preserving current control boundaries. The consultant must restore the process in a repeatable way for recurring monthly use.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:
A) Copy the administrator role permissions to the operations team for the restricted region so the submit action appears consistently.
B) Temporarily move the restricted regional population into the general operations scope during each month-end cycle and restore it afterward.
C) Review the operations role permissions and target population settings for the specific correction process, then adjust only the authorized submit scope required for that restricted region.
D) Ask HR administrators to process the restricted region each month and keep operations users assigned only to nonrestricted populations.
4. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Business Unit References for Insurance Employee Records</strong> During template remediation, most branch employee updates validate correctly, but selected insurance claims supervisor records show a business unit relationship that does not match the expected legal entity context. Insurance division business unit values were adjusted after the initial foundation data load.
Which action best supports a controlled remediation decision?
Response:
A) Compare affected records against active legal entity and business unit values, then correct only records with confirmed dependency impact.
B) Give compliance managers access to all insurance employee records so they can manually review and correct legal entity context.
C) Continue regulated workforce review because the employee records can be updated and the context can be reviewed later.
D) Reload all foundation, employee, and position records because any post-load business unit adjustment invalidates the full remediation population.
5. A consultant is validating a manager-led internal reassignment process in a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant before user training. In the web-based UI, managers can select company and legal entity, but for one newly activated organizational structure the business unit list includes valid-looking entries from a neighboring structure. The transaction remains usable, yet testers repeatedly select incorrect combinations because the filtered scope is broader than intended.
Other structures display the correct narrowed list. The customer wants the issue fixed without exposing business units across unrelated structures and without creating a separate reassignment process for the new rollout group. Reporting accuracy and approval routing depend on correct business unit selection.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:
A) Review the organizational associations for company, legal entity, and business unit in the new structure, then correct the relationship controlling filtered business unit availability.
B) Create duplicate business unit records for the new structure so the intended values appear separately from the neighboring structure.
C) Broaden business unit visibility for all nearby structures so the same larger list appears consistently during reassignment processing.
D) Ask managers to continue using the current list and rely on training instructions to select the intended business unit during reassignment.
Solutions:
| Question # 1 Answer: B | Question # 2 Answer: C | Question # 3 Answer: C | Question # 4 Answer: A | Question # 5 Answer: A |
We're so confident of our products that we provide no hassle product exchange.


By Claire

